Was it my serenity, or,
Was it my insensitivity?
Was it my modesty, or,
Was it my laxity?
Was it my ignorance, or,
Was it my dimness?
Was I too much, or,
Was I too less?
Was I not who I promised to be?
[2017]
Where I attempt to capture the Trials, Travails and Tribulations of Law, Love and Life!!!
Was it my serenity, or,
Was it my insensitivity?
Was it my modesty, or,
Was it my laxity?
Was it my ignorance, or,
Was it my dimness?
Was I too much, or,
Was I too less?
Was I not who I promised to be?
[2017]
Introduction
The
2012 Delhi gang-rape was an unfortunate incident which shook the heart of the
nation and struck a raw nerve. It brought out people on to the streets to put
up a brave front against such vicious and brutal crimes that defy all bounds of
morality. The incident also ignited national discourse on the question of
juvenile delinquency as one of the prime accused in the case was a juvenile,
just few months shy of turning eighteen – the age of majority under Indian law.
The fact that this accused was tried in a juvenile court, thus escaping a death
sentence, triggered a massive outcry on the inadequacy of the juvenile law to
treat cases where such heinous crimes had been committed.
The
negative public perception was captured perfectly through the words of Maneka
Gandhi, when she remarked that “an adult crime by a juvenile required adult
punishment, not leniency.”[1]
The anger stirred by the treatment of the juvenile along with other factors
such as the increase in juvenile crime rate and deplorable conditions of juvenile
homes, forced the Parliament into deliberation and The Juvenile Justice (Care
and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereafter referred to as “the Act”) took
birth, ushering in a new era of juvenile justice laws in India.
The word juvenile is commonly used to refer to children, or people below the age of eighteen. The term in itself does not imply anything negative, nevertheless, it is commonly perceived to be attached with children who have committed a crime. In fact, the term juvenile although not defined in the Act, refers to all those who cannot be considered as adults. There are many jurists and academicians who have criticised the use of the word juvenile as it bears a negative psychological ring to it. The 2015 legislation has, to a limited extent, attempted to address these apprehensions by substituting its use. Yet, the title of the Act continues to carry the word juvenile, which shows the half-baked approach of the law-makers.